Cost of Conciseness in Sponsored Search Auctions
Source:
Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE) (2007)
URL:
http://www2007.org/workshops/paper_79.pdf
Abstract:
We study keyword auctions in a setting where bidders have a vector of
values for slots, and a bidder's value for a slot is not necessarily
proportional to the expected number of clicks in that
slot. Specifically, bidders need not only derive values from clicks on
their ad, nor do they need to value clicks in all slots equally.
This is the most general model of bidder valuations (without externalities) in sponsored search, and encompasses a variety of advertising objectives, including conversions and branding.
We study the properties of the generalized second price auction when
bidders with such vector values report a single scalar bid to the
auction (we assume that bidders and the auctioneer agree on a
ranking of the slots). We compare against the efficient, welfare
maximizing outcome of the VCG mechanism with input as the full
vector of values. Surprisingly, we find that there always exists an
equilibrium corresponding to the VCG outcome, when bids and prices
are per-impression in the generalized second price auction. If bids
and prices are per-click, this need not be the case: in fact, an
equilibrium need not even exist. However, under monotonicity
conditions on the valuations of bidders and clickthrough rates, the
VCG outcome is indeed an equilibrium of the system.
Finally, we discuss the problem of bidding strategies leading to such
efficient equilibria: contrary to the case when bidder values are
one-dimensional, bidding strategies with reasonable restrictions on
bid values do not exist.